Analogue noise is reduced through improved pre-amp and output circuits too.Ħ studio-quality sound FX - Sweep, Filter, Crush, Dub Echo, Noise and Space - are available on every channel.
#Pioneer djm 900 nexus 2 plus
Plus the versatile DJM-900NXS2 has an independent Send/Return, 4 phono inputs and 2 USB ports – giving you flexibility to set it up your way.Ī studio-quality, 96 kHz/64-bit digital signal processor uses enhanced dithering technology and a low-jitter clock to deliver a warm, natural analog sound. We’ve fine-tuned the EQ and fader curves and enhanced the FX controls to give you even more creative choice. I would need a side by side for my own ears to believe otherwise.Take your performance to new heights with the DJM-900NXS2, which features our first ever 64-bit mixing processor for a warmer, more nuanced sound. This means that the sound quality on the V10 is most likely the same as on the NXS2.
#Pioneer djm 900 nexus 2 pro
They all just say it's pro quality - nothing about an update. I have looked extensively, as my ideal mixer would be DJM FX with Xone sound quality, but nothing in the specs or advertising language of the V10 suggests this is an upgraded DAC. ***\* And most importantly while Pioneer has released the updated V10, the Digital to Analog converters in the V10 are the same model, built by the same company who built the Digital to Analog converters (DAC) on the DJM 900 NXS2. It was significantly less noticeable on my QSCs. While the sound difference was perceptible on high quality studio monitors, I don't think it would be as noticeable on loud speakers. At nearly any club or festival, your mixer is going to be run into a digital house board AFTER it goes through your DJ mixer. The DJM uses a processor to sum your signals up so it never sounds quite as out of control as a bad mix on the Xone.
#Pioneer djm 900 nexus 2 how to
I'm not sure how to put it - it's like you're mixing two analog electrical signals and need to ride the gain more as a result.
At this point you have converted the audio into digital then back into analog. In order to utilize effects with the Xone 96, unless you are paying money for good quality analog effects, you are going to run it through something digital - like, for example, the venerable RMX-1000. The Xone 96 does not have any effects.
That being said I sold the Allen & Heath Xone 96 and kept the DJM-900 NXS2. We began to debate whether there are some humans out there who just can't hear the difference between good analog and digital. The Allen & Heath Xone 96 hands down sounded better. We could then use the faders to switch back and forth between the mixers to compare sound quality. We then set optimal gain and used a decibel meter we use for our local parties (so we can legally argue with the police) to make sure both mixers were set equally (because the human brain will always tell you louder sounds better.) With this setup I was able to cue up the same track on both CDJs and hit play at the same time. Right: CDJ 2000 NXS2 -> Pioneer DJM 900NXS2 -> Yamaha HS8 -> Yamaha HS8s Left: CDJ 2000 NXS2 -> Xone 96 -> Yamaha HS8 -> Yamaha HS8s I performed a side by side test of the two mixers with the following signal chain: I happened to be lucky enough to have a Xone 96 and a Pioneer DJM-900 NXS2 in my possession at the same time last year.
0 kommentar(er)
